All introductory text books about holography make a comparison with photography, saying that
photography is a technique that is only capable for recording the intensity of the light scattered
by a real object, while holography records both intensity and the phase of that light. What
they fail to mention is that when one looks at a display hologram, the image is in most cases
monochromatic, so in this case this advantage of holography over photography is completely
true only when comparing black and white photography with monochromatic holography.
Today almost all photography is in full color. In order to make the advantage
mentioned true for color photography, the holograms must be recorded in full color.
This has been obtained in rainbow holography by multiplexing three rainbow
holograms with different slit locations, so that an image color is obtained with a
single laser and monochromatic recording material. But the color of image depends
strongly on the relative position of the slit, and in any case this color is
synthesized from three or more monochromatic holograms, with the object
illuminated with a monochromatic source. So that although we can get good color,
the color cannot be considered as “real”. True color holograms can only be
obtained from the light scattered by an object illuminated by several different
wavelengths. Two major practical problems are found when trying to make such a
hologram.
The first one is related with the lasers. While red lasers (He–Ne or semiconductor
lasers) are common in many holographic laboratories (they are cheap and easy to
maintain) green and blue lasers are more difficult to find since they are more
expensive (e.g. argon ion, frequency-doubled Nd–YAG) or have limited holographic
performance (e.g. He–Cd).
The other problem is the recording material. Traditionally, the materials
used for recording color holograms have been panchromatic silver halide
emulsions, multiple layer dichromated gelatin and panchromatic photopolymers.
For dichromated gelatin, with spectral sensitivity in the blue–green zone of
the visual spectrum, the red gratings had to be recorded with very special
procedures. The blue and the green holograms were recorded individually,
not multiplexed, and the final multiple-band hologram had to be built up
by laminating the three individual gelatin layers one over the other with
complex and costly techniques [1]. In the late 80’s and early 90’s, commercial
panchromatic photopolymers [2] emerged as an alternative to DCG [3]. Silver
halide-sensitized gelatin processes with panchromatic emulsion PFG03-C have also
been used, with high diffraction efficiencies for single wavelength recordings
[4].
Silver halide holographic emulsions exhibit a better sensitivity than all the recording
materials mentioned above. Nevertheless, although they have been used for recording
multiplexed reflection holograms with different laser lines [5, 6], their usage has been
limited by their relatively low index modulation capacity, as well as by their spectral
sensitivities, since most of them are sensitized to a single spectral band only. Besides,
the material is composed of ultra fine silver halide grains, with an intrinsic
absorption band around 400 nm. Therefore, blue recordings do not work properly,
since they have low diffraction efficiencies due to high levels of absorption
and scattering. This led to the use of techniques involving recordings in
more than one plate [7] or more than one recording material [8]. The use of
monochromatic emulsions for multiplexing reflection gratings with different
swelling factors between recordings has been also reported [9], although in this
case we are again working with synthetic color. In all these configurations,
emulsions were useful for display and artistic holography. In the mid 90’s, new
ultra fine grain panchromatic emulsions, especially Slavich PFG-03C, with a
mean grain size of 10 nm—smaller than that of the emulsions previously
available—boosted advances in these two fields [10]. More recently, results obtained
with a non-commercial ultra fine grain panchromatic emulsion have been reported,
with diffraction efficiencies for single exposure diffraction gratings higher than 50%
[11].
There are several aspects that have to be considered when working with multiplexed
reflection holograms with different wavelengths in silver halide materials. The
first is the high scattering, mentioned above, that occurs in the blue part of
the spectrum. This scattering can be reduced by working with ultra fine
grain emulsions. In this study we used the new panchromatic ultra fine grain
emulsion BBVPan, based on the existing family of BB emulsions, currently
manufactured by Colourholographics Ltd, with a mean grain size of 20 nm. The
second aspect is related to shrinkage or swelling of the emulsion after the
plate is processed, since in reflection holography this is directly related to
the wavelength of reconstruction, and this affects the final replay spectrum
and color rendition of the grating. The last aspect is the effect of multiple
exposures on a single emulsion, since this is associated with a reduction
in the diffraction efficiency. This reduction has been historically evaluated
as inversely proportional to the square of the total number of recordings
[12].
Experiments
We recorded color reflection holograms using the new panchromatic ultra fine grain
emulsion BBVPan, batch no. 174. In all our works with BB emulsions we have
presensitized them in order to reduce the exposure times. Previous work in reflection
holography with BB640 emulsions showed a response in the 604 nm range,
instead of the expected 633 nm of the He–Ne laser, an effect caused by the
presensitizing bath composed of a 3% triethanolamine (TEA)–water solution. TEA is
an electron donor that increase the speed of photographic emulsions and
photopolymers. But it is also known to be a swelling agent used to reduce the replay
wavelength of the holograms, and has this additional effect when used in
presensitization. We found that an additional water bath following the first TEA
solution bath reduces the swelling effect. The soaking time in this second bath
is important and has to be adjusted to obtain the proper wavelength at
reconstruction.
In all the tests reported here, plates were presensitized by soaking for 2 min in a 3%
TEA water solution, 7 min in a deionized water bath, drying with a photographic
roll and warm air, and leaving in the exposure room for half an hour in normal
laboratory conditions (20∘ and 60% RH) [13].
For the above characterization study, plates were exposed to single collimated beams
in a Denisyuk configuration [14] using a blue He–Cd laser (wavelength 442 nm), a
green frequency-doubled Nd–YAG laser (wavelength 532 nm), and a red
He–Ne laser (wavelength 632.8 nm). The recording setup consists of an
optical sandwich composed of a first surface mirror that reflects the incident
beam back into the emulsion. The emulsion side of the plate is in contact
with the mirror via an index matching fluid, and the glass side is in contact
with an anti-reflection coated glass plate via another thin layer of index
matching fluid to prevent internal reflections. The setup schematic is shown in
figure 1.
With this configuration spatial frequencies of 7145 l/mm (blue), 5936 l/mm (green)
and 4990 l/mm (red) were recorded (considering a refractive index of 1.579 for the
unexposed emulsion). The sandwich was mounted on a computer controlled
motorized holder which enabled us to record 9 gratings with different exposure
energies on a 2” × 2.5” plate. The size of the plate was obtained by cutting each of
the 4” × 5” plate into 4 pieces, since at the time we performed our study we had only
5 of these plates available.
The diffuse object color hologram study was performed with a holographic setup in a
Denisyuk configuration shown in figure 2. The folding mirrors were sequentially
placed in order to multiplex the three holograms, starting with the blue, then the
green and finally the red laser. Plate size for this study was 2” × 2.5”, except for the
last one that was 4” × 2.5”.
Exposed plates were developed with AAC developer (Ascorbic Acid 18 g/l + Sodium
Carbonate 60 g/l) [15]. After washing they were bleached with fixation-free
rehalogenating bleach R-10 (Potassium Dichromate 2 g/l + Sulphuric Acid
10 cc/l + Potassium Bromide 35 g/l). After bleaching, the plates were washed and
soaked in deionized water with a few drops of Photoflo and Acetic Acid to
prevent printout, and dried in the normal laboratory conditions mentioned
above.
After drying, the plates recorded in both the characterization setup and the diffuse
object setup were analysed using a fibre fed spectroradiometer. With this
device we measured the zero order of the grating with a replay angle of 0∘,
matching the recording geometry. A short arc xenon lamp was used as the light
source, collimated and polarized perpendicular to the plane of incidence
to match the recording conditions. Light was collected by an optical fibre
that fed the spectrophotometer and data were transferred to a computer
for storage and analysis. Reflection losses were experimentally evaluated
and found to have a value of 6.7%. The schematic of this setup is shown in
figure 3.
Two different studies were performed: a preliminary spectral sensitivity characterization
of the plates, followed by a study of multiplexed gratings on a single plate with plane
gratings and a diffusing object.
Characterization of the Plates
The plates were first tested for single wavelength recordings with each of the laser
beams used in order to check their spectral sensitivity and the response of the
material when recording holographic reflection gratings. Three sets of tests, one for
each wavelength, were carried out, including presensitizing, exposing, processing and
analysis as explained above. Exposure energies ranged from 30 to 2400 J/cm2 for
the He–Cd laser and from 150 to 2400 J/cm2 for the frequency-doubled Nd–YAG
and He–Ne lasers.
Multiplexed Holograms
In this case, the exposure of the reflection gratings was made sequentially on
the same area of the plate, starting with the blue wavelength, followed by
green and then red. We obtained a set of multiplexed reflection gratings
with different exposure energy combinations for each wavelength, ranging
from 120 to 225 J/cm2 for the He–Cd laser, 150 to 250 J/cm2 for the
frequency-doubled Nd–YAG laser and 800 to 1200 J/cm2 for the He–Ne
laser.
Results
Single sensitivities of BBVPan plates for each of the three recording wavelengths are
presented in figure 4, and the most relevant results are summarized in table 1. From
these results it is clear that the exposure energy for maximum Diffraction
Efficiency (DE) of this emulsion is the highest for the blue wavelength (
320 J/cm2), followed by the green (1200 J/cm2) and with the lowest sensitivity
for the red (2400 J/cm2). Replay wavelengths match very closely with
those used at recording, with an error of less than 2%. This wavelength shift
can be modified by changing the soaking bath times in the presensitizing
process.
Table 1. Relevant results obtained for single-wavelength recording of holographic reflection
gratings on BBVPan plates
| Recording | Max DE (%) | Energy for max. | Replay (nm) | Δ (nm) |
| (nm) | | DE (J/cm2) | | |
| 442 | 73.7 | 320 | 448.6 | 25.2 |
| 532 | 82.8 | 1200 | 536.7 | 29.0 |
| 632.8 | 74.1 | 2400 | 645.9 | 26.0 |
|
One of the key characteristics of this new material is its even response to all the
wavelengths we used. Former western emulsions suffered from high absorption in the
blue region of the spectrum. This limited their use for recording multiplexed color
reflection holograms on a single plate. With the experimental setup described
above, we worked not only with three well-separated wavelengths, but with
the highest spatial frequencies holographically achievable in each case. The
results obtained show that the maximum diffraction efficiency with each
of these spatial frequencies is almost constant, with a small drop in the
case of the blue wavelength due to the proximity of the absorption band
of the silver halide grains, located at about 400 nm, and the absorption
band of the supporting glass plate and the gelatin emulsion. For the red
wavelength there is another small drop in diffraction efficiency, but this time
due only to the low sensitivity of the plate in this region of the spectrum.
Nevertheless, all maximum DE values for single wavelength are well above
70%.
The transmission spectra of the recordings corresponding to the three diffraction
efficiency maxima are shown in figure 5. The blue band is affected by the absorption
of the ultra fine grain emulsion referred to above, thus reducing the diffraction
efficiency of this recording, although the zero order is of the same magnitude as that
obtained with the green wavelength.
With all the information obtained after this preliminary study, we multiplexed three
reflection gratings, each with a different wavelength, onto a single plate, following the
procedure described in section 2. The best result was obtained with a sequence of
exposures with energies of 150 (442 nm) + 250 (532 nm) + 1200 (632.8 nm)
J/cm2, at which the diffraction efficiencies of each band are balanced, as shown in
table 2, with the corresponding spectral transmission curve shown in figure 6. The
DE for all the recordings is higher than 52%, which indicates a high index
modulation capacity for this material. Other exposure energy sets were tested, and
small changes in one of the exposures were seen to substantially affect the DE of all
three bands.
Table 2. Relevant results obtained for multiplexed holographic reflection gratings recorded with
three wavelengths on BBVPan plates
| Recording | Exposure | DE (%) | Replay (nm) | Δ (nm) |
| (nm) | (J/cm2) | | | |
| 442 | 150 | 57.1 | 452.5 | 19.4 |
| 532 | 250 | 62.1 | 546.3 | 17.2 |
| 632.8 | 1200 | 52.6 | 650.8 | 19.4 |
|
In order to check that the effect of crosstalk between diffraction bands was negligible,
we applied a model based on Kogelnik’s theory with three bands [16]. With
this model we obtained the index modulation and effective thickness of the
multiple band recordings with great accuracy. Experimental data were fitted
and a good match was obtained, as can be seen in figure 6, in which the
dashed curve corresponds to the theoretical approach. The best result was
obtained for an effective thickness d of 7.3 m. Approaches with three different
values of the index modulation n1, one for each wavelength, were tried, but
the best result was obtained when each one had the same value, namely
0.027.
After looking at the results obtained in this study with reflection diffraction gratings,
several of the points raised in the introduction may now be discussed. The high
diffraction efficiencies obtained with the multiplexed holograms contradicts
what has been said about a reduction in diffraction efficiency of multiplexed
holograms (although those studies were done with angular multiplexing). In fact,
results obtained with this material show that its modulation capacity is
greater than that needed to record a unique holographic grating, since if
we consider such a case, we can obtain a maximum index modulation of
0.054, while if we use the sum of the three individual index modulations
as the storage capacity of the material, a value of 0.081 is obtained. This
is much higher than any other reported value for a silver halide emulsion.
Therefore, the total DE is not reduced by multiplexing several gratings, but is
increased to another value that corresponds to the real storage capacity of this
emulsion.
After completing this study with gratings, and considering the sensitivity values
obtained, we continued with a study with diffuse object holograms. We chose an
object containing tones which were hard to reproduce, such as skin color,
yellow-orange, and blue. The best result, one with high brightness and good color
reproduction, was obtained with exposure energies of: 225 J/cm2 (He–Cd),
350 J/cm2 (Nd:YAG) and 1.5 mJ/cm2 (He–Ne), values which are not very far
form the optimal values obtained for diffraction gratings. A color reproduction of the
final hologram, replayed with an halogen lamp, and with the real object under the
same illumination, is shown in figure 7.
Replay wavelengths with an angle of reconstruction of 45∘ are 445 nm, 538 nm and
639 nm, which are very close to the recording wavelengths. A sample of the
transmittance spectrum obtained with the analysis device with the probe beam
incident at an arbitrary location of the hologram is shown in figure 8. Estimated
diffraction efficiencies for each of the bands are around 20% for the blue and green
bands and around 40% for the red, which are not bad values for a diffuse object. It
must be noted that the transmittance spectrum depends on the area of the hologram
sampled.
Conclusions
We tested the new BBVPan panchromatic holographic emulsions for reflection
holography. The material was first evaluated using single recordings with three
different wavelengths, and a DE higher than 72% was reached in all cases. After
characterization, the plates were used to record a three-band holographic reflection
grating with spatial frequencies from 5000 l/mm to more than 7000 l/mm, all with
high diffraction efficiencies, namely over 52% for each of the three bands. The study
with diffuse objects rendered good color images with good diffraction efficiencies.
With the properties mentioned, this material can be used to manufacture
holographic combiners for projection display systems, as well as for color display
holograms.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful Michael Medora of Colourholographics Ltd for providing the
holographic plates used in this work.
References
[1] J. R. Magariños and D. J. Coleman 1985 Holographic mirrors Opt.
Eng. 24 (5) 769–780
[2] T. H. Jeong and E. Wesley 1989 True color holography on du Pont
photopolymer material Holosphere 16 (4) 20
[3] T. J. Trout, W. J. Gambogi and S. H. Stevenson 1995
Photopolymer materials for color holography Proc. Int. Conf. on Applications of
Optical Holography SPIE 94–105
[4] J. M. Kim, B. S. Choi, Y. S. Choi, J. M. Kim, H. I. Bjelkhagen and
N. J. Phillips 2002 Holographic optical elements recorded in silver halide
sensitized gelatin emulsions. part ii. Reflection holographic optical elements
Appl. Opt. 41 (8) 1522–1533
[5] L. H. Lin, K. S. Pennington, G. W. Stroke and A. E. Labeyrie 1966
Multicolor holographic image reconstruction with white-light illumination Bell
Syst. Tech. J. 45 659–661
[6] J. Upatnieks, J. Marks and R. Fedorowicz 1966 Color
holograms for white light reconstruction Appl. Phys. Lett. 8 (11) 286–287
[7] P. Hariharan, W. H. Steel and Z. S. Hegedus 1977 Multicolor
holographic imaging with a white-light source Opt. Lett. 1 8–9
[8] T. Kubota 1986 Recording of high quality color holograms Appl.
Opt. 25 4141–4145
[9] P. M. Pombo, R. M. Oliveira and Jo an L. Pinto 2002 Color
control in reflection holograms recorded in Slavich PFG-01 emulsions Practical
Holography XVI and Holographic Materials VIII ed T. John Trout and SPIE
399–404
[10] H. I. Bjelkhagen, T. H. Jeong and D. Vukicevic 1996 Color
reflection holograms recorded in a panchromatic ultrahigh-resolution
single-layer silver halide emulsion J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 40 (2) 134–146
[11] C. Wang, D. Pu, T. Zhu, J. Wu and M. Tang 2002 Panchromatic
ultra-fine-grain silver halide emulsions and their properties in reflection
holography Holography, Diffractive Optics and Applications ed Y. Sheng, D. Hsu
and J. Chen SPIE 121–125
[12] M. K. Shevtsov 1985 Diffraction efficiency of phase holograms for
exposure superposition Sov. J. Opt. Technol. 52 1–3
[13] M. Medora 2003 Colourholographics Ltd, Braxted Park, Gt.
Braxted, Witham, Essex, CM8 3XB England (Personal communication)
[14] Y. N. Denisyuk 2001 Photographic Reconstruction of the Optical
Properties of an Object in its Own Scattered Radiation Field, volume MS 171 of
Milestone Series SPIE 22–24
[15] M. Ulibarrena, M. J. Méndez, L. Carretero, R. Madrigal and
A. Fimia July 2002 Comparison of direct, rehalogenating and solvent
bleaching processes with BB640 plates Appl. Opt. 41 (20) 4120–4123
[16] M. Ulibarrena, L. Carretero, R. F. Madrigal, S. Blaya and A.
Fimia 2003 Multiple band holographic reflection gratings recorded in new
ultra-fine grain emulsion BBVPan Opt. Express 11 (25) 3385–3392